Why Wynn Would Be a Great Shortstop (and Suck as a Goalie). It’s All How You Look at It.

/ 4 Comments

It’s Andy here today. Ann is in OurLittleCorner focusing on big white hats.

Wynn with one of her “baseballs” during a fetching session.

If you’ve followed our blog at all you’ve learned a few things about Wynn, our Cardigan Welsh Corgi.  We’ve blogged about her ”Jurassic bark,” her gluttonous eating style, her love of bully sticks, how her brain works, her political preferences, her food-theft capers, why she’s into butt-sniffing, and her opossum herding skills (to name just a few things).   For today’s blog I’m going to share my thoughts on why I am convinced that she would make a dynamite shortstop (and a not-so-dynamite goalie).

My assessment of her baseball potential is based on four years of observing her fetch balls. I did the math and calculated that four years of twice-a-day play sessions each with a minimum of ten ball throws per session adds up to 29,200 fetches — ample data for assessing her potential. Her speed, agility, and long, low-slung body (that is ideal for trapping fast grounders) are definitely shortstop-worthy attributes.

I’m not alone in imagining how a dog would fare on the baseball field. I found a number of references to dogs as either mascots or “bat dogs” (like “Rookie” the bat dog for the Trenton Thunder, an AA affiliate of the New York Yankees ). But given Wynn’s skill level, I’m sure she would find such froufrou jobs demeaning.

Rookie the “bat dog” of the Trenton Thunder, an AA affiliate of the New York Yankees. Wynn would be insulted if she were asked to do this job. ( Photo source: American Kennel Club)

I did come across one promising blog post title: “Batter Up,Pups! Matching Dog Breeds to Baseball Positions.” However, I was disappointed to find that Cardigan Corgis were nowhere in the lineup. Worse yet, Border Collies were designated “the shortstops of the dog world” because they are “agile, quick, and always on the move.” The blog failed to mention that border collies are high strung and have no sense of humor whatsoever. Who has ever heard of a good shortstop with no sense of humor?

So where’s the Cardigan Corgi? (source: Petsetc.com)

But to fully appreciate Wynn’s baseball potential you need to know how she visually processes fast-moving objects (think baseballs) relative to her ball-catching muzzle — what I will call “muzzle-eye coordination.” It’s important to note that dogs do not see movement like we do. According to PetMD.com

Dogs have more rods in the retina than humans do. Rods are sensitive to shape, movement, and dim light. Dogs can see moving objects much better than stationary objects, and they have 10-20 times greater motion sensitivity than humans. (emphasis added)


I’m not sure I understand how this all works, but a Scientific American article explains that the “flicker rate” (the speed which the nervous system processes sensory information) is higher in dogs than humans. This means that a line drive hit toward Wynn would approach in “slow motion” from her point of view. To help visualize this I have produced the following educational video:

A BigLittleMeals Educational Video: Why Wynn Would Be A Great Shortstop

If Wynn is so good at dealing with fast-moving balls, you must be wondering why I think that she would suck as a goalie . The reason has to do with another aspect of how she sees the world: Like all other dogs, she’s color blind.

Dogvision.com, a fascinating website devoted to canine vision, explains that dogs have “dichromatic vision.” This means that they see primarily blue and yellow shades and can’t distinguish between red and green. Wynn as a goalie may be able to field bullet shots on goal, but when putting the ball back in play would she be able to distinguish between the jerseys of her teammates and those worn by opponents? Very likely not.

Although I didn’t produce an educational video to illustrate how color blindness would affect her fitness to be a goalie, the Dogvision.com web site has a “dog vision simulator“which allows one to upload any photo and compare it to how a dog would see it. [Editor’s note: I found several sites that use this conversion technology and from what I can gather the conversion, although not perfect, is pretty accurate]. To give you an example of how this works I uploaded a photo of some of the balls Wynn plays with daily.

This is how Wynn sees the balls that she has chased 29,200 times.

I assume that if Wynn were on a soccer team it most likely would be on a women’s team, so I selected a couple of random photos of women in soccer matches to illustrate how Wynn would see the other players. It’s pretty clear how difficult it would be for her to pick out her teammates in the heat of a match. I see no soccer fame in Wynn’s future.

Comparative photos created with the “dog vision simulator” (at Dogvision.com).

I’m going to close with one more observation. If you think that how a dog sees things is interesting, consider that a common housefly’s vision is roughly 3 to 4 times faster than a dog’s, allowing it to perceive the world in even slower motion. Can you imagine what a line drive would look like to a fly? Or (I can’t help myself here) what a fly ball must look like?

Enough of this; it’s time for Wynn’s afternoon play session.

Stout?

/ 6 Comments

It‘s Ann here today. Andy is in OurLittleCorner with a stamp of approval.

My interest in “stout” began a few weeks ago when our food-writer daughter said I should make a sticky toffee pudding recipe with a “Stout Caramel” sauce for a dinner party we were having. She had written an article for The SF Standard raving about the delicious food at San Francisco’s new Dingles Public House. I was supposed to figure out how to replicate this dessert she’d been served. I knew from her article that it had Guinness Stout in the sauce and Earl Grey tea in the pudding.

Rather than tackle the challenging sauce and pudding project and do some friction maxxing (remember Andy’s last blog?), I took the easy way out and sat and day-dreamed about other things, such as…

What does the word “STOUT” really mean?

STOUT: A dark, full-bodied ale?

Clearly a stout – from St James Gate, Ireland

STOUT: having physical strength and vigor?

These three women seem pretty stout. Photo from Netflix and How to Get to Heaven from Belfast, a series we just enjoyed.

STOUT: Someone who is brave, bold, resolute, full of courage?

(note here to all my CC Gamma Phi Besties: didn’t we used to sing, “With our crescent of pearls, we are stouthearted girls”?). Below is a statue of a woman who was really stouthearted, probably more so than me and my Besties! 🙂

Statue of Grainne Mhaol Ni Mhaille , Grace O’Malley, 1530-1603), the Irish Pirate, located at Westport House, Co. Mayo, Ireland

In case you’re unfamiliar with Grace O’Malley, here’s what Anne Chambers, author of the biography about O’Malley (entitled Granuaile ) writes: O’Malley was a “fearless leader by land and by sea, political pragmatist and tactician, rebel, pirate and matriarch, the ’most notorious woman in all the coasts of Ireland’ GRACE O’MALLEY challenges and manipulates the turbulent politics of the 16th century. Breaching boundaries of gender imbalance and bias, she re-wrote the rules to become one of the world’s first documented feminist trail-blazers.” You can read more about this Irish Pirate here.

STOUT: A person who has a thick body?

Is one of them stout?

When I finally got up the nerve to try to develop a recipe, I was a little anxious about the potential calorie content…after all, at my age it’s easy to get a little stout. So I looked up some exercises…the kind I might actually do. Please turn the sound on so you can fully appreciate why I think this fits today’s blog.

Sea shanties came along probably 200+ years after the Irish Pirate Grace O’Malley lived – but I think she would have liked this song, “The Wellerman,”even though the lyrics refer to whaling ships in New Zealand in the mid-1800’s and the singer, Nathan Evans, is Scottish, not Irish, and didn’t record it until 2021, 418 years after her death. Would she have been happy that it became a huge TikTok hit?

Facebook reel by Doc H.

After picking and choosing ingredients and measurements and instructions from about eight online Sticky Toffee Pudding recipes, I’m pleased with the way my recipes turned out – even if it was a struggle. Whew.

Hope you have a happy and fun St. Patrick’s Day next Tuesday. We suggest you enjoy a Guinness, watch the How to Get to Heaven from Belfast series, read up on pirates (especially Irish women pirates), and have a (small) piece of Sticky Toffee Pudding – served on top of a big spoonful of Guinness STOUT Caramel Sauce and topped with vanilla gelato. Then do a wee bit of exercise.

Guinness Stout Caramel Sauce

This is adapted from a Food52 recipe.

  • 1 12-ounce bottle of Guinness extra stout
  • 3/4 c light brown sugar
  • 1 tsp vanilla
  • 2 T butter
  • 1 c cream
  • 1/4 tsp Diamond kosher salt

Pour the stout into a medium saucepan and heat to boiling. Reduce heat to a simmer and cook until the stout is reduced by about half.

Stir in the brown sugar and vanilla. Heat to boiling, reduce heat to a simmer and let mixture cook for 8-10 minutes without stirring.

Remove from heat, add the butter, cream and salt and gently stir. Put into a glass container and let cool. Refrigerate – and use within 2 weeks.

Recipe brought to you by BigLittleMeals.com and Andy and Ann.

Sticky Toffee Pudding

The cinnamon, nutmeg, cardamon, and ginger can be omitted – and the cake may actually be more traditional and just as delicious…but I like the flavor they add.

  • 1/2 lb (about 8 oz) pitted dates , roughly chopped
  • 1  1/3 c boiling water (optional: add 3 bags of Earl Grey tea to the boiling water and steep for 4 minutes before pouring over dates)
  • 1 tsp baking soda
  • 8 T butter, softened
  • 3/4 c light brown sugar , loosely packed
  • 3 eggs 
  • 1 T golden syrup (optional but delicious)
  • 2 tsp vanilla
  • 3/4 tsp cinnamon
  • 1/2 tsp nutmeg
  • 1/4 tsp cardamon
  • 1/4 tsp ground ginger
  • 1 tsp Diamond kosher salt
  • 1 1/2 tsp baking powder
  • 1 3/4 c flour

Preheat oven to 350 degrees. Grease and flour a 9″x12″ baking pan.

Place dates in a medium bowl and add the boiling water. Stir in the baking soda (it will fizz).

Put the flour in a medium bowl, then whisk in the cinnamon, nutmeg, cardamon, ginger, salt and baking powder.

Place butter and brown sugar in a bowl or food processor. Beat or process until smooth. Add eggs, syrup and vanilla and beat until well-blended. Add the flour mixture and mix until just incorporated. Then add the date mixture and mix or process until combined well – but don’t over mix.

Scrape the batter into the prepared pan and bake for 30-35 minutes – or until a toothpick inserted in the middle comes out clean.

Cool the pudding in the pan on a wire rack. To serve – cut into small squares, ideally while it’s still slightly warm and place each square on top of a generous spoonful of Guinness Stout Caramel Sauce, then top it all with with a little vanilla gelato.

Recipe brought to you by BigLittleMeals.com and Andy and Ann.

When “Friction-Maxxing” Can Be a Piece of Cake

/ 2 Comments

It’s Andy here today. Ann is in OurLittleCorner staring at clouds.

Our son, Travis, recently sent us a link to a New York Magazine article entitled In 2026, We Are Friction-Maxxing by Kathryn Jezer-Morton (who has a PhD in sociology I might add). The term “friction-maxxing,” which she coined for the article must have touched a collective nerve; reactions almost immediately appeared in on-line publications such asThe Guardian, Forbes, Elle Decor, Financial Times, Slate, Cybernews, and the HuffPost, not to mention a slew of blogs, Instagram posts, and YouTube videos.

Illustration by Hannah Buckman from Jezer-Morton’s New York Magazine article.

The crux of Jezer-Morton’s argument is that our culture is increasingly being defined by the desire to avoid the “frictions” of everyday life. It’s a desire fostered by the marketing strategies of tech companies whose “friction-elimination tools” are reaping huge profits:

Tech companies are succeeding in making us think of life itself as inconvenient and something to be continuously escaping from, into digital padded rooms of predictive algorithms and single-tap commands: Reading is boring; talking is awkward; moving is tiring; leaving the house is daunting. Thinking is hard. Interacting with strangers is scary. Risking an unexpected reaction from someone isn’t worth it. Speaking at all — overrated. These are all frictions that we can now eliminate, easily, and we do.

Rather than trying to escape from the frictions of our daily lives, Jezer-Morton argues that we should try to meet these inconveniences (or frictions) head on. And it’s not simply a matter of abandoning “friction-elimination” tech tools. We must learn to tolerate the uncertainties of “living with other people in spaces that are impossible to completely control.” This is essential, she says, to “preserve our humanity.”

The catch is that facing friction is not for the faint-hearted. It takes will power and self discipline. This spartan attitude is being echoed in most of the on-line discussions of Jezer-Morton’s article — toughen up, deny the lures of escapism, and avoid the paths of least resistance.

Jezer-Morton offers few suggestions to begin “your friction-maxxing journey:”

  • Stop sharing your location with your kids and your partner (on smartphones)
  • Stop using ChatGPT completely.
  • Invite people over to your house without cleaning it all the way up.
  • Babysit for someone who needs a night out

While I found Jezer-Morton’s argument to be compelling, she is largely addressing a relatively young audience (her article appears under the tagline “Brooding: Deep thoughts on modern family life”) and fails to consider an important segment of our population — the nearly invisible cohort of older people (aka, the “elderly”) who endure a lion’s share of daily friction. As a card-carrying member of this cohort I thought it may be valuable to share some of my own thoughts on friction-maxxing.

The way I look at it aging is a process of “frictionization.” As we get older, friction increasingly becomes an unescapable part of our daily routine. This means that for us older folks friction-maxxing is not some illusive goal requiring will power or self discipline — it’s how we roll. Let me provide a couple of personal examples.

To start with, a not-surprising affliction for many of us in this age group is being “techtarded.” This dramatically limits our ability to deploy the latest technology to even get fleeting moments of escape from our friction-filed lives. The amount of friction I encounter while trying to figure out how to use these so called “friction-elimination tools” by far exceeds any friction–saving advantages I might gain. The other evening Ann and I thought it might be fun to take a little friction break via Crossplay, a two-person word game app recently launched by the NYTimes. After more than a frustrating hour trying to synchronize our smart phones in order to play the game we gave up in exasperation. Instead of an escape, our efforts ushered even more friction into our lives (along with considerable tension).

A NYTimes “friction-elimination app” ? Ann and I would play if we could ever sync our %#*@ smart phones .

Composing this blog is another example of how friction has become an integral part of my life. Writing has never been easy for me, but nowadays it seems to require much more effort. WordPress (the program we use for our blog) records a copy of each revision; at this point while writing today’s blog I can see that I’m up to 95 revisions (and the program only keeps track of 100 revisions). That’s a hell of a lot of friction (although it’s a type of friction that brings considerable satisfaction). [Editor’s note: I should add that I stubbornly refuse to use the “Improve with AI” option that WordPress dangles seductively on the right side of my screen — however, I do shamelessly (and frequently) use the spell-check option].

I could go on (and on) with examples, but because the number of revisions allotted to me for this blog is maxxed out I’ll conclude with a couple of thoughts. First, I believe that Jezer-Morton is spot-on with her her observation that tech companies have developed addictive apps and methods for eliminating many of the frictions of our daily life. However, I also believe that unless an app is miraculously developed that allows us to bypass the aging process, friction will eventually become a reality we will have to learn to cope with. And from my experience that’s not bad.

Scroll to Top